DOGMA 69
This is an edict long over due.
I’ve been watching porn since, god knows when, and I couldn’t help but learn
a few important things. So here, young porn entrepreneurs, an aesthetic to
go for. This is what I’ve learned:
- Faces – Drama is in the face, the body parts we’ve seen many, many times.
They are needed, but not emotive. In general, there should almost always
be at least one woman’s face in the frame. It all comes through the face,
especially when a woman’s getting fucked, regardless of her acting talent.
Men’s faces should be ignored, even avoided.
Also, any woman’s face can be a conduit for energy
from any sexual activity. She can carry energy from a sex act not even involving
her, if her face is near-by (assuming she’s also in a sex act). Though, in
reality, it’s the face acting as a conduit of her energy, even if it seems to
be relieving the energy being created right before.
- Genitalia – Genitalia is only interesting in regards to faces. But it is
the bread & butter. They remind the viewer in a very basic way what they
are watching and why. I.e. can’t have a war movie with no guns.
Another way of thinking about it. The face is what
makes the character an individual “person.” You need to have a specific “person”
to have sex, if you/the viewer are to be creating a sex environment. Because
there is the world in front of you on the screen, but there is the parallel
one in your mind.
Once you have the “person,” then you need them to
have sex. Genitalia evoke sex, in particular, the thought of the sexual act.
Genitalia, with motion/manipulation, are creating energy, friction, heat, but
it stays contained in the film environment until you go back to the face. The
face is how we relate to that energy; it’s how it gets from the world on the
screen, into the world with the characters in our mind.
As such, a sequence may start on a girls face.
We have a person. Tilt down and reveal genitalia. Potential energy. Manipulation
of said genitalia. Kinetic energy builds. Tilt up to a face of twisting enthusiasm,
and energy transfers out of face and is made “real.” But in general, it’s preferable
to have a continual system of energy being created thru genitalia and released
thru the face, with both elements in the frame, by crafty composition—by using
mirrors, even.
Another way of thinking about it is each tit, dick,
and twat is an energy loci, with their own gravity. Visualizing it is like
visualizing Einstein’s model of time and space, where certain spots condense
according to gravitational pull. These three vertices (well, I guess four technically)
have gravitational pull. Tension is created by going toward them. Once in
the shot, it’s a positive stimulus. Hence lesbian stuff with faces and genitalia
and various permutations is a good source of positive stimulus.
Yet, another way of thinking of it, women are “sweet”
and men are “sour.” Faces have the strongest flavor, genitalia is more like
additive spices. And you can have sweet alone, but not sour alone, or certainly
not for too long. But mix them right and it can work.
Two women kissing is very powerful, two strong sweets
together. But, of course, too much sugar can bore and dull the palette…. And
two female faces with a garnish of genitalia is even better. BUT, of course,
effectiveness of stimulus increases with size. So, while putting in more dicks
and cunts and tits would certainly add spice, you lose the eroticism in the
details of a close-up of a female embrace. And in the face eyes and then mouths
are most important.
- Stimulus – in porn, the viewer will give himself to being manipulated, as
long as there is continual, positive stimulus. It is expected, porn is very
functional. You can go crazy with German Impressionistic sets and noir lighting,
but the leitmotif must not interfere with eventual nut-busting.
And everything can be broken down as positive and
negative stimulus. Male faces, negative. Male bodies, negative, but less so.
Female faces, positive. Female bodies, positive, but also less so. Genitals,
either way, positive. Female bodies decapitated are not appealing, while male
bodies decapitated are ideal.
Negative stimulus can also come from personal, subjective
turn-offs, anything from the aesthetic to the hygienic. For me, saliva, is
not erotic. When not connected to a loci, especially, spit and dangling slobber,
it is not erotic. Further anything scatological, feces, urine, is not erotic.
However, sweat, lube can be erotic. Male or female ejaculate can go either
way, depend on whether it strikes my hygienic reflex. Further, diversion from
the ideal male/female physical form, is negative. I.e. midgets, hermaphrodites
(they count as male), the inordinately old or fat or ugly, etc. But confidence,
character, and engagement are most important in determining attractiveness.
Positive stimulus is texture. Is emotion. Is heat
or cold (not dead). Is backstory and drama too. Ingenuity is also a plus.
E.g. a well composed frame with a phallus, a vagina, a hand and/or some inanimate
(or mechanically animate) objects, and of course a female face. Engagement,
again, is good. Best is for the actors to feel in the environment, engaging
the other actors, the camera, even inwardly into their emotions, anything’s
better than being distracted. Nothing worse than have the camera unexpectedly
pan up from a money-shot to a see woman cleaning her fingernails—then, invariably,
she instantly jumps into orgasmic screaming.
- Multi-tasking – it’s all about permutations, clever arrangements, that’s
all there is to the 4th stage, which is most about movement, the
real “nitty gritty.” That’s why gang-bangs have been favorites for compositions
since those etchings in the marquis de sade books. The best actresses, best
know how to multi-task, using as much of themselves and their body as they
can, engaging as many people/things as possible. Multi-tasking is very much
connected to female behavior.
- Ratio – one girl, good. many girls, good. many girls, one guy, good.
Many guys, many girls, good. Many guys, one girl, good. Many guys, bad.
One guy, bad. The rule: at least one girl. You can get just as much positive
stimulus out of having just one girl with a lot of guys, but you need at least
one girl. Though this should not be too surprising, it shows how essential
the women are and how expendable/less important the men are.
- Narrative arc – porn is a lot like pop music, in that it can be great in
its simplicity. (Though, as with pop music, there can be genius in the details.
We’ve just yet to have the Micheal Jackson of porn… Hmm, that sounds wrong.)
- First, the interaction. Of course, some character building before interaction
is good, especially if there is an obvious protagonist, who would probably
need to be female. Porn can and should start and end with the female face.
But it really begins with the first eye-contact. However, sometimes the
interaction is with the camera, or interacting within—but not removed, because
until there’s engaged emotion, there is no beginning. This moment defines
the relationships.
- Second, undressing/foreplay. Of course, both of these stages may be no
longer than a minute total. It can be a quick sequence, but it should:
a) be stimulating (keeping to the loci, returning to the face for release),
b) keep chronology/flow (don’t have them talk for 5 minutes, then just have
their clothes disappear; but don’t have long undressing, if you just meet
the characters--in general, the two stages should balance/complement and
approx. equal in length), and c) reflect themes and relationships.
Further, a sequence can gather in intensity by
going: eye-engagement, light touching/kissing, undressing, heavy kissing/groping,
in general, working down. However, it’s not necessarily down, but from face
toward loci. Commonly this is face, shoulder/navel, then breasts, then inner
thigh/pelvic, ending at vagina. The men need not so elaborate a sequence, in
fact, after this stage you need not even see his face anymore. With multiple
women, these stages can become more interesting a) because deals with faces,
b) women interact subtly, better, and c), particularly to stir lesbian eroticism,
this extra time helps create comfort between the actresses and yet creates tension
for the arc.
- Third, oral sex. Important, as it transitions from faces to loci, after
which faces are mostly just outlets for energy. But this stage is important
to attach faces to body parts. Attaching faces and body parts doesn’t necessarily
require direct juxtaposition; though it is good to get a person’s face and
genitalia in the same shot, or within short time intervals.
The order is usually male onto female, quickly,
then female onto male. Or just female on male. Or female onto female onto
male. Regardless, in this stage, oral sex performed by men is given less attention.
The female face is preferred, thus fellatio gets the most time, as it is most
common, though female-female cunnilingus can also be just as powerful (as it
is all contingent on having a female face, to fix on, to “engage,” for an outlet
to the sexual energy being created adjacently). This is why actresses constantly
have to move their hair out of the way, as if you can’t see the face (in particular
the eyes) oral on either sex loses its arousal with no outlet to circulate energy.
Of course, a new outlet can be created through the face of the one receiving—hence,
a good way to show cunnilingus on woman by a man is to shoot from behind his
head, so as to only get her face.
- Four, the nitty gritty. Here is where ingenuity most pays off. This
stage is usually the longest. For an average twenty minute scene, there
might be 1 minute for each of the first two stages, then 5 minutes for the
third stage, 10 minutes for this stage, and 3 minutes for the end
In general, the first third is easy, slow, parallel,
face-to-face. The second third is more energetic, perpendicular, off-to-side.
The final third is even more frenetic, but rhythmic, strong, usually in doggie-style,
or someway where the gazes are usually disconnected. It’s first, with the first
penetration, which first connects the two. Then it’s exploring it through each
other. But finally, it ends selfishly, as it must to orgasm. This point(s)
of introversion, where the actress or actor is feeling only their body, is/are
important. This is the only other time a man’s face is needed. At first, to
connect to the body. And second, to connect to the orgasm. One should try
to capture as many points of introversion of the women, and perhaps a quick
peek of the man’s at the end of this stage.
- Five, the culmination, aka the cumshot. Now, when men sometimes ejaculate
on the small of a woman’s back or something, its obviously best to have
it end with fellatio. And at that point of culmination, the woman’s face
then must be an outlet for a large release of energy. To succeed, she should
receive the ejaculate like its nectar from the gods. And not under some
stupid pretense like “mmm, I think spooge is yummy,” but merely as treating
it as something important, ergo, gagging on it like its acid, could work
as well (though only with an a propos exploitative/aggressive leitmotif).
This is where I feel a lot of directors foolishly
choose the moment right before he ejaculates to pan up and show his face. You
show his face when he first goes selfishly inward, further this is less
negatively stimulating as he’s not engaging us (or her) but himself. Men’s
faces don’t work as outlets, they are merely for connecting. Thus, for the
last three minutes should end on a woman’s face. In lesbian scenes, you can’t
have the juxtaposition of orgasm with face as easily, but you also have the
option of ending on the face of the woman receiving the final orgasm.
In three minutes, the first two can build up to
the final orgasm. But there must be a final orgasm, neglecting the first three
stages is bad, but neglecting the last is most egregious. The final orgasm
is when you want your audience to orgasm. Then the last minute is just cool
down, but she should still be engaged in the activity as not everyone’s timing
is perfect.
- Sound – please don’t overdub. Not just because most overdubs are annoyingly
obvious, but because the real sounds are better than the fake ones, regardless
of technical quality. And if she can’t make the right sounds, she’s not going
to be making the right faces, so what’s the point? And no music either.
And not just because bad directors usually have bad music taste (heavy metal,
cheesy synthesizer, etc.), and most porn directors are bad directors. But
because music is so subjective, it can easily be negative stimulus. Personally,
I think rap might be a propos. But that could easily be negative stimulus
to the 45-year-old middle-american overweight construction worker.
But I’m referring specifically to music that just
serves as “wall to wall carpeting,” that is omnipresent. However, details are
always good, in all things. In porn especially, like a pearl necklace (a real
one) and pumps, gives an almost marxist angle to your average gang-bang. Thus
a little music, perhaps. But just as the genius comes in the minutia, you can’t
fuck with the formula. I mean, I’m not a purist in anything else, but this
is porn, not Brecht, if you make the audience stop and think, then you’ve fucked
up. What you want to see is fucking. What you want to hear is fucking. The
sex act is mesmerizing in itself, treat it as such, think of what the actors
are doing is a noble service. They are giving a part of themselves. However
bad an actor they are, if they are fucking they’re fucking, and so it comes
through the face, and the camera’s there to share it with the rest of the world.